Category Archives: Uncategorized

New Job Update

I’m on my third week at my new job, and I’m starting to get a better idea about what it’s like to work there. Every place has it’s quirks, but I think I’ll be able to live with the ones here.

After I successfully reconfigured my machine’s development environment, (since the first time I had some trouble with the Active Reports designer) my new boss said, “Hey, now that you know how to do this, why don’t you refresh a couple of our test VMs to get them current with production.”

Epic. Fail.

It wasn’t actually that bad, but I was a bit disgruntled to be doing admin work when I was hired to be a developer, and the company has two full time admins plus a remote part-timer. But wait, it gets better. A few days later, when I had another error that was occurring on my machine but not on the one belonging to the developer I was working with, we decided that my machine was just crap, and we just needed to get me a laptop. The image used for laptops is different (needing different drivers, after all), so we figured there must just be something wrong with the desktop image.

Turns out it wasn’t that after all, but I’m glad I got the laptop anyway. That way I can work from home if I need to. Needless to say, with all the starting over I had to do, I’d had quite enough by the time I was done.

After my admin stint, however, I got into making real changes to the site. Actual user requests, too, not “Alphabetize all the procedures in this program.” Even though, most of my changes were in the Active Reports designer, I got a glimpse at how things are structured here. All of the data access (and it seems some of the business logic) is in SQL Server stored procedures. This is an interesting concept for me, since my former employer didn’t use any stored procedures. I suppose it’s good thing that the first certification I’ll be working on is for SQL Server.

I’ve had all kinds of idea for blog posts over the past couple of days, but with things as hectic as they have been, I just haven’t had the opportunity. Since my wife is up in Arkansas and I’m down in Louisiana for the rest of the week, I’ll probably get an opportunity to post a couple more times. Perhaps that will help alleviate the guilt of infrequent posting!

My First Week

I just finished my first week at my new job. Unfortunately, there’s not a whole lot to tell about the differences in development experience at this point, because I haven’t gotten the development environment totally set up yet. I thought we were there at the end of Thursday, but Friday we found out that my machine wouldn’t display the ActiveReports designer correctly, no matter what we tried. So I’m going to have to go through the whole setup process again (not to mention reinstall all my pet tools like VIM) on another machine. Looking forward to actually being productive sometime next week.

The first day was mostly signing stuff and meeting everyone. There are about 50 or so developers, contrary to what I may have told people earlier. Enough that it will still take me a while to remember everyone’s names. One thing that was kind of disappointing that I discovered was that I’m not allowed to do paid consulting work outside my job, since this would be a conflict of interests with my employer. I can still do things for free, though, so I can help out whatever church I end up attending.

That’s it for now, I suppose. I’ll post again when I have a better picture of what the development experience is going to be like

Dallas Tech Fest 08

I’m so glad I decided to go to Dallas this weekend. Since I’m starting a new job this Wednesday, I almost skipped out to clean the house more in preparation to sell it. In the end, though, my wife and I decided that we’d gotten enough done already that it would be okay if I went.

I got to hear some great talks, participate in an alternate languages open spaces, and sit in on a .NET Rocks episode recording on building community. And on top of that, I won a Mac Mini and a copy of Vista to dual boot on it! That’s right, I’m composing this blog post from that very computer. Makes the $60 in gas to get down and back up seem like a good investment, huh? 😉

I’ve got material for several posts from the stuff I got to do there, so stay tuned!

A Big Decision

     This past Tuesday, I resigned from my job of three and a half years, and my last day is May 2nd.  This wasn’t caused by any real dissatisfaction with my job.  Though not perfect, I enjoyed my work and liked my co-workers.  My wife and I had decided shortly after our daughter was born that we wanted to be closer to family.  A five hour drive may not seem like a long way to some of you, but it meant that our parents only got to see Molly once every couple of months, which is huge when you’re talking about a seven-month-old. 

     In a lot of ways, it feels like a graduation.  It began recently enough that I can still remember my first couple of weeks vividly, but long enough ago that it feels extremely odd to think about not going there and seeing the same people every day.

     I wonder if it might also be like a graduation in that I feel like where I’m going is more like the “real” world.  Even though my old shop makes use of the .NET platform, it really doesn’t feel like a .NET shop.  It’s an IBM mainframe shop that dabbles in .NET.  The place I’m going has been using the .NET platform since its inception, and uses it as their primary development environment.  There a little bit of RoR going on (which I take as a good sign; they’re open to new and non-MS things), but mostly ASP.NET in C#.

     Also, rather than being an in-house IT provider, my new employer is a consulting firm.  This will be a bit of a change for me.  I’m used to dealing with one particular business (transportation), but now I’ll have exposure to all different kinds of industries.  My customers used to be just a flight of stairs away, and were almost always willing to sit down with you to discuss a feature that you were working on.  I have no idea now how accessible my new customers will be, or how much interaction I’ll have with them.

     Another thing that will be new is certifications.  I’m not sure which (if any) devs at my old employer have MS certifications.  Since they have their own training department, it’s assumed that everything necessary will be covered in training classes.  The new place doesn’t have it’s own training department, and besides, they want to give outside customers the warm fuzzy feeling that all the developers are “Microsoft Certified.”  I’ve been told that when I start, I’ll have a goal set for a certain number of certifications by the end of my first six months.  The company will pay for the books, plus my first attempt at the test.  Fail, and I’ll have to pay for the next test myself.  :-/

     Related to that, I’ll also have a training budget for books, conferences, etc., which ought to be cool.  Something like $3k a year, plus about three weeks per year of dedicated training time.  Not sure exactly how I’ll use it yet, but I’m sure I’ll figure out something.  😉

     I’ve made a lot of friends in Fort Smith, and I’m going to miss them all a lot.  I’m not sure how I’m going to be able to work without getting Travis Ebert’s weekend updates, and without being able to run over to David Mohundro’s cube when I have a design question.  Not living next door to Josh and Jennifer Pense (our best friends and carbon-copies) will feel so strange, and we will miss them terribly.

     On top of everything, our house was recently damaged by hail, so we have to get all of the siding and windows on the front of the house replaced and get a new roof before we can put it on the market.

     I apologize if I’ve rambled a bit.  My brain has been a bit addled since Tuesday, but I knew I had to get this post done soon, or I would never do it.  I’ll be able to post more descriptive updates regarding the new job once I start on the 7th.

     It’s a huge decision, and kind of scary, but I know God will guide our family in the direction He wants us to go.  “And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.”

My First Real ASP.NET Site

I’m fortunate enough to be one of the first developers at my current employer to create a site using ASP.NET.  Currently, almost all our internet and intranet applications are built with classic ASP.  Yeah, I know.  Early adopters we ain’t.  As cool as it is that I’m getting to blaze this trail, it also means that there’s little guidance to be had, and no internal examples to look at.  Even the guys I usually go to for advice at work (Kerry Jenkins and David Mohundro) haven’t used ASP.NET that much.

Right now, I’m still struggling to come up with an architecture that I think will be clean, but will also be understandable by people that come along behind me.  I know this problem has been solved a bazillion times before, but I’ve found it a bit hard to find some examples that are close enough to real-world complexity.  I took a look at Code Camp Server, but it uses NHibernate, which I don’t think is an option for us.  Using open-source software to build applications is viewed with more than a little apprehension by management.  Their reasoning is that if something goes wrong with the software, no one has a responsibility to offer us support.  I think that hinders us in a lot of ways, but that’s a topic for another post. 😉

So, lacking any good examples, I came up with something myself.  To illustrate, I’ll use an example scenario:  creating a new user account.  I’m going to simplify it and just talk about the architecturally relevant parts.  (I’m sure nobody cares what my CSS looks like.) 

The solution has four main projects:

  • Web (Controls and aspx’s)
  • BusinessLogicLayer (so there’s as little code in the aspx.vb’s as possible)
  • DataAccessLayer (DB2 Database stuff)
  • ObjectModel (DTOs and stuff)

So, say I have a Register.aspx that looks like this:

        Please choose a user name and password:

        User Name:


        Confirm Password:
                    onclick=”submitButton_Click” />

Standard stuff.  One thing that gave me a bit of trouble was how to get error messages back to the UI.  I toyed with the idea of having something named Context that would contain both the object the UI needed, plus messages about any errors that happened while performing the request.  I eventually rejected that in favor of having my pages implement an interface like this:

    public interface IView
        string ErrorMessage { set; }

So my business logic services can take an IView in their constructors, then set the ErrorMessage property when it encounters an error.  So I end up with something like this:

public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page, IView
        WebUserService _userSvc;

        protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
            _userSvc = new WebUserService(this);

        protected void submitButton_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
            WebUser user = _userSvc.CreateNewWebUser(userNameTextBox.Text, passwordTextBox.Text);

            if (user != null)
                FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(user.UserName, false);

        #region IView Members

        public string ErrorMessage
                serverValidator.ErrorMessage = value;
                serverValidator.IsValid = false;



public class WebUserService
        private IView _view;

        public WebUserService(IView view)
            _view = view;

        public WebUser CreateNewWebUser(string userName, string password)
            WebUserRepository rep = new WebUserRepository();
            WebUser user = null;

            if (rep.GetWebUserByUserName(userName) == null)
                user = rep.CreateNewWebUser(userName, password);
                _view.ErrorMessage = “That username is not available.  Please choose a different one.”;

            return user;

public class WebUser
        public string UserName { get; set; }

Another thing I had a bit of trouble with was deciding where to check for things like duplicates in the database.  I thought that if I did most of that in the data access layer, I’d have the same problem communicating error messages back to the business logic layer that I did to the UI.  So, I decided to try to make the data access layer methods as granular as possible so I could do all that kind of validation in the business logic layer.  It’s more chatty than I’d like, but I think it will work for me, since we really don’t have any logic in the database.  (We don’t use stored procs or anything, because higher-ups don’t want any logic in the DB). 

I think this setup ought to work for most cases, but I don’t really have enough experience to know if I’m on the right track here.  If someone with more ASP.NET experience than me has any suggestions, I’m wide open.  I’ll post more of my experiences as I go along.

More Adventures with Witty

As you may have noticed, I haven’t been keeping up with my desired posting rate lately.  That’s mostly because I’ve been spending most of my outside-of-work “geek time” working on Witty, an open source Twitter client written in C# using WPF.  After my positive experience building in proxy support, I decided to implement another feature that I particularly wanted to see, namely “toast” popups.  (You know, those little mini windows that show up at the bottom right of your screen when you get a message in some IM clients.)

This enhancement was already posted as an issue on Witty’s issue board, so I knew I wasn’t off base thinking it was missing.  The person who originally asked for the enhancement suggested that we send messages using Snarl, an application aimed at recreating Growl on the Mac, to minimize the additional code needed to achieve the toast functionality.  So I visited the site, looked at the API, and set about trying to send Snarl messages from a C# program.

Even though the site listed C# as one of the supported environments, it turned out that the only semi-useful library available was unmanaged C++.  “No problem,” I thought.  All Snarl requires that you do is send a Windows message to the Snarl application, so I figured that I could translate the needed Win32 calls by looking at (a wonderful resource for Win32 interop programming, btw).

I was half right, I suppose.  The SendMessage call was easy enough to duplicate, but the kicker was the data structure I needed to pass to the Snarl application.  As I would soon discover, even though the type names in C++ and C# are very similar, they mean different things behind the scenes. 

For example, a “long” that was part of the data structure in C++ is actually only 32 bits in size, whereas a “long” in C# is 64 bits.  Those were easy enough to fix, since C#’s “int” type is the appropriate length.  The character arrays were a bit trickier.  First of all, a “char” in C++ is one byte, while in C# it is 2 bytes.  You can get around that by changing the char arrays to byte arrays.  But the thing is, arrays in .NET are a totally different animal than they are in C++.  In order to use fixed-length arrays like Snarl wanted I had to use the “fixed” keyword, like this:

public fixed byte text[1024];

The problem with that is that in order to get it to compile, you have to mark the struct using it with the keyword “unsafe.”  Yuck, that doesn’t sound good, does it?  And it’s not.  When you do things like that, you open yourself up to all kinds of mess that you thought you left behind when you started writing .NET code.  Not fun.

But, hey, it got messages to from Witty to Snarl, so I submitted a patch.  The guys were happy to see progress made, but the unsafe marker made everybody nervous.  Plus, it meant relying on an outside application for notifications.  So, I got to work doing what I probably should have in the first place:  creating integrated popups in WPF.

Meanwhile, Michael Letterle got wind of the Snarl integration that we were trying to do, and fixed those notifications faster that should be humanly possible.  The trick was a couple of attributes I’d never heard of before:  [StructLayout] and [MarshalAs].  The structure ended up looking like this:

[StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential, CharSet = CharSet.Ansi)]
    struct SNARLSTRUCT
        public int cmd;
        public int id;
        public int timeout;
        public int lngData2;
        [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValArray, SizeConst = SnarlInterface.SNARL_STRING_LENGTH)]
        public char[] title;
        [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValArray, SizeConst = SnarlInterface.SNARL_STRING_LENGTH)]
        public char[] text;
        [MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.ByValArray, SizeConst = SnarlInterface.SNARL_STRING_LENGTH)]
        public char[] icon;

Normally, the CLR will store a structure’s component parts wherever it feels like, so the parts of the struct could be separated.  In a managed world, this doesn’t bother us, we can always get back to the data if we need it.  But if we need to pass this struct to unmanaged code, we have to tell the CLR specifically to keep all the parts in one place, which we can do by specifying the [StructLayout] attribute.  I’m a little fuzzier about what the [MarshalAs] attribute does, but it’s pretty obvious that it’s telling the CLR how this managed data needs to be translated when passed to unmanaged code, and it lets us specify a length for the arrays.

Back in WPF land, I got to play around with a bunch of neat stuff.  Even just copying the look and feel of the login window, I started to get a feel for XAML, at least in some of its simper forms.  I thought that the way it defines animations was particularly interesting.  To do a fade-out for the popups, I used something like this:



I just think it’s cool that you can declaratively define an animation sequence.  It just seems a lot more self-contained and comprehendible when it’s laid out like this, as opposed to a chunk of imperative code.  It’s hard to define why it feels better, but it just does.  I think that’s what they call getting the zen of a particular technology, and I think I may have gotten a whiff of the zen of WPF here.  I’m hopeful that we’ll be able to start using WPF in my workplace within the next couple of years.  We’ve still got some Win2k machines out in the field, so they will have to be phased out before that can happen.  That, and they’ll have to spring for VS 2008 for the developers ;-).

I’ve had a lot of fun working on this, but after this feature is declared finished, I think I ought to work on a bug fix next.  One of the things I’ve heard about OS projects is that most people just want to work on new features, and it’s hard to get people to fix bugs.  I want to be more responsible than that, so I think I’ll take one (or a few) for the team and do something that may not be quite as fun next time.

Keep checking for new releases, Witty is getting better all the time!

My First Contribution to Open Source

As you probably know from previous posts, I am a recent convert to Twitterism.  I totally dig the dirt simple minimalist web UI that the service provides, but I noticed that several of the people I was following were using some other kind of client to tweet with.  So I checked out the one I saw The Elder using, called Witty

Well, it turns out that he helped write the thing, along with Jon Galloway, project owner Alan Le, and several others.  It was a nice piece of WPF-y eye candy, and worked perfectly, too.  At least, as long as you weren’t behind a proxyI’ve mentioned my utter loathing of my employer’s proxy before (and in association with Twitter), and this just added insult to injury.  So, since it was open source, I decided to make a patch to add proxy support for Witty.

It took me most of an afternoon, but I’m sure others could have done it much more quickly.  The real meat of the changes were pretty darn simple, since the .NET API for performing HTTP requests allows a proxy configuration as an optional parameter.  But I’d never used TortoiseSVN before (a popular application used to interact with a Subversion source control repository), I’d never written an angle bracket of XAML, and I was looking at the codebase for the first time, so I cut myself some slack.  😉

So, by that afternoon, I had the changes working.  A few days later, after getting in contact with Alan and him patiently explaining the proper way to post changes (there’s a “Create Patch” option in TortoiseSVN), I submitted my changes for review.  Frankly, having never contributed to an open source project before, and coming from a development shop that is really just getting started in .NET (and thusly hasn’t provided a whole lot of guidance on good design), I was afraid my code wasn’t going to be up to snuff.  However, Alan contacted me later that day to tell me he thought my changes looked solid and that he had merged them with lots of other improvements contributors had made to the project.  That evening, he posted Witty version 0.1.7 Beta 1 to it’s Google Code page.  Code I wrote was officially available to the whole world!

It was a lot of fun working on the enhancement, and rewarding to think that I may have helped a person or two out.  There’s a lot still to work on, though.  For example, even though you can receive tweets through an authenticated proxy on Witty now, the avatar images don’t show up if you’ve got that same proxy configuration on IE.  That’s because the XAML elements used for the avatar images use the real twitter URLs as their source property, so the application uses IE’s configuration when going to get those images.  Since there’s no way to authenticate when the app makes those requests, you never get the images back. 

Anyway, such is the life of an OS app.  Always more to do.  I highly encourage you to find an open source project you like and take a crack at adding a feature or fixing a bug.  I had a great time doing it, and I plan to continue.  Not only is it rewarding to help someone out, but it also exposes you to others’ code, which can only help you improve your own style and technical chops. 

P.S. – Don’t forget to check out Witty:-)

P.P.S. – Note to other people at the company I work for: this doesn’t mean Witty works for us now.  The net nanny still blocks any web requests to a Twitter URL, so we’re pretty much out of luck. :-/

Excellent ALT.NET Podcast

Today’s Hanselminutes episode has Scott interviewing David Laribee, the guy who coined the name “ALT.NET.”  I think he went a long way toward explaining the motivations of the movement, as well as its position regarding Microsoft.  Several things he said actually surprised me. 

First, he said that an Agile approach may not be appropriate for all scenarios (specifically very large teams)…  Wha?  You mean Agile is not the panacea for all your development ills?  Sarcasm aside, even though many knowledgeable developers believe that Agile environments can benefit most teams (and I have neither the experience nor the will to contradict them), it’s good to hear such a non-dogmatic statement coming from an ALT.NET leader.

Also, in the same vein, he said that waterfall might not be bad in all cases, and that he had been a part of several successful waterfall-style projects.  Now that really surprised me.  Even mentioning the waterfall approach to building systems has been kind of a cue to pounce on someone (as in the case of Frans Bouma), so in this case as well, it’s refreshing to hear what seems to be a moderate voice.

It’s possible that David held back a bit during the interview; I really don’t know, since I haven’t read much of his blog.  But it could also be that I have committed the cardinal sin of letting the commenters on ALT.NET blogs color my perception of what the actual leaders of the movement believe.  All I know for sure is that I’ve got a new entry on my blogroll, and I feel like I really do need to stay tuned in to this influential segment of the software development community.

Ambivalence and ALT.NET

It pains me to say it, but ever since I tuned in to the ALT.NET movement, it’s kind of rubbed me the wrong way.  The content of the posts that I read are generally pretty good (and at times great), but what gets to me is the overall negative tone of the community.  Rather than just trying to get the word out about the cool open source (or just non-Microsoft) technologies that are out there, and the Agile methods and practices that can make your life easier, the prevailing message seems to be, “If you’re not already doing this, you’re a sub-par developer.”

I understand the need for a foil for Microsoft, the need for a periodic reminder that not everything that comes out of Redmond is gold.  But I think it can be accomplished in a more positive way.  In an email conversation with Jeffrey Palermo, I asserted that what we need are “Agile Evangelists,” missionaries into the land of Mort that can spread the word about the good news of a more Agile approach to software development.  But what we seem to get most of the time are complaints that Microsoft isn’t doing enough, and that bosses, co-workers, or fellow .NET community members are too dull to realize the benefits of what they’re touting.

You can see this dynamic in action if you watch the video of ScottGu presenting the very first peek at ASP.NET MVC to the ALT.NET conference in Austin.  For the most part, things go fine, but there a few tense moments where people asking questions are downright belligerent.  Since the MVC framework is a genuine (IMHO) attempt by Microsoft to reach out to this community, you’d think they would be a bit more cordial.

That said, I think their message is a sound one.  Most developers that I know don’t devote a lot of extra time to learning new technologies, and thusly have a limited perspective.  That’s not intended as an insult.  These guys program for 9 hours a day, there’s no reason to expect them to take more time away from their friends and families to tinker with the newest language they heard about on Twitter.  Those of us that feel compelled to do so, however, (I think) have a responsibility to at least make them aware that there are other things out there.  If the only exposure they have to this outside community is a blog post they stumble upon that rants for hundreds of words about how Microsoft will never release anything worth using and that all developers who don’t use technology X are just wasting their time, how likely do you think they’ll be to try technology X?  Ever? 

This isn’t in any way intended to be some kind of personal attack on those who actively participate in this sub-culture.  I think the ALT.NETers have a lot of good things to say, and a lot that they can teach the larger .NET community.  If they can temper their message a bit, I think they will reach enough of us that I think of as the “tuned-in small names” that there can be some progress in exposing Agile practices and open-source tools to the masses.

Inaugural Fort Smith .NET User Group Meeting

Thanks to the hard work of several people in the Fort Smith area, our first DNUG meeting was a great success.  Raymond Lewallen spoke on Behavior Driven Development, a subject I had been curious about.  I’d heard that it was the right way to do Test Driven Development, but little other than that.  Ray did a great job explaining the gist of it.  Since Mo has already listed some great resources on learning about BDD, I’m just going to highlight some of the things that were interesting to me.

First of all, the way Ray named his test fixtures and tests jumped out at me.  Normally in TDD (in my limited experience), you’d have a fixture named AccountTests to test an Account object, and tests named something like New_balance_should_reflect_old_balance_plus_deposit_amount.  Rather than doing that, Ray’s fixture would be named When_depositing_money_into_an_account and the test would be named New_balance_should_reflect_old_balance_plus_deposit_amount.  The difference there is that the context of the tests is defined by the fixture name, and the test describes the event and the expectation of the results of that event.  I think that’s a much better way to name your fixtures, and better leads you to what tests you need to write.  Ray said that that was one of the main goals of BDD, not just writing tests, but writing the right tests.

Also, he demonstrated a project he worked on called Spec Unit, which makes using assertions in NUnit easier.  Normally, you’d write an assertion in NUnit like this: 

Assert.AreEqual(250.00, account.Balance);

By using extension methods, Spec Unit allows you to write this instead:


That reads a whole lot more like English, and thus makes it easier to understand what the test is doing (which is another goal of BDD).  It also includes some stuff to let you run some reports on your tests that help you track your development.  Definitely worth checking out if you’re writing tests in NUnit.

I’m afraid a subject this in-depth may have scared off some of the people attending the meeting who are fairly new to .NET, and may have not ever seen unit testing frameworks before.  I think the meeting on March 31st may be a little more accessible.  Chris Koenig will be coming to speak on Silverlight, which ought to be cool.  I’m hoping that he shows us some Silverlight 2.0 code, since that’s what’s really interesting to me.  If you’re in the area, please come to the meeting!  And stay tuned to the user group’s site for information on future events.